| IntroductionAs a result of new environmental regulations  to reduce the amount of sulfur in vehicle transportation fuels, the need to  study the catalytic hydrodesulphurization process is steadily increasing [1, 2].   Therefore, great interest has been focused on the research of  new routes to obtain catalysts for hydrodesulphurization (HDS).  In spite of the great variety of routes  used, mechanical alloying (MA) routes have not been explored  satisfactorily.  By using MA it has  been possible to synthesize novel materials with special physical and  chemical properties [3, 4].  Elaboration of Raney-type catalyst  combines powder metallurgy routes with chemical treatments to obtain a highly  porous final product. Unsupported catalysts called NEBULA (New Bulk  Activity) based on Ni-Mo-W, are four times more active than typical catalysts  and two times more than advanced formulations [5].  These types of catalysts opened  the way to new bulk catalysts with improved catalytic activity in HDS. In this work, quaternary alloys of Ni-Mo-W-Al  were prepared by MA.  In addition, a  process of chemical extraction by alkaline leaching was applied to remove  aluminum in order to increase the specific surface area (SSA) and to generate  porous materials which were tested in the HDS of dibenzothiophene (DBT) to  determine their catalytic activity and the selectivity. ExperimentalNickel (99.8% purity, -300 mesh), molybdenum  (99.9% purity, -200 mesh), tungsten (99.9% purity, -325 mesh), and aluminum  (99.5% purity, -325 mesh), crystalline metal powders were used as raw  materials.  Nominal composition was  set to (Ni50Mo25W25)50Al50  mol%.  The MA experimental runs were  performed at room temperature in a commercial high-energy ball mill (Spex  8000).  The milling time intervals  were 0, 3, 6 and 9 h.  Methanol was  used as process control agent.  The  milling media to powder mass ratio was maintained constant at 5 : 1 for all  experiments.  Argon atmosphere was  selected during the milling process.   In order to increase the SSA the as-milled products were leached in an  alkaline potassium hydroxide solution (KOH 20 mass% and pH = 12) at room  temperature for 1 h. Catalysts Characterization SSA was measured using a Quantachrome Nova  1000 series by nitrogen adsorption at 77 K,  using the BET method.  Samples were  degassed under vacuum at 473 K before  nitrogen adsorption.  X-Ray  diffraction (XRD) studies were performed using a Philips XPert MPD  Diffractometer equipped with a curve graphite monochromator, using a Cu Kα radiation (λ =1.54056  Å) and operated at 43 kV and 30 mA.   Catalyst morphology was studied using a JEOL JSM-5800 LV scanning  electron microscope analyzing several fields at different magnifications.  Trasmission electron micrographs  were obtained in a Philips CM200 trasmission electron microscope operated at  200 kV with an LaB6 filament as a source of electrons. Catalytic Activity and  SelectivityThe HDS of DBT has been  extensively studied as a model reaction HDS of petroleum feedstock [6].   Laboratory-scale studies have been performed in pressurized  flow [7] and batch reactors [8-12].  By using batch reactors, useful  information such as reaction rate constants (k) and selectivity (HYD/DDS) can  be obtained by following the composition of the reaction mixture as a  function of time.  In this work, the  HDS of DBT was carried out in a Parr model 4560 high-pressure batch  reactor.  One gram of catalyst was  placed in the reactor with the reagents  (5 vol% of DBT in decaline).  The  reactor was then pressurized to 3.1 MPa with hydrogen and heated up till 623  K.  After the working temperature was  reached, sampling for chromatographic analysis was performed during the  course of each run to determine conversion versus time dependence.  The reaction time averaged was 5 hours.  The resulting products were analyzed using  a Perkin-Elmer Clarus 500 gas chromatograph  provided with an autosampler and equipped with a 2.736 m long packed column  containing 3% OV-17 (phenyl methyl dimethyl silicone, 10% phenyl) as  separating phase on Chromosorb WAW 80/100.  After catalytic evaluation, the  samples were separated from the reaction mixture by filtration, then washed  with 2-propanol to remove residual reaction products and dried at room  temperature.  The main reaction products  from the HDS of DBT were biphenyl (BP), cyclohexylbenzene (CHB) and  tetrahydrodibenzothiophene (THDBT). Results and DiscussionFigure 1 shows the XRD patterns obtained from  powders produced by MA.  For the  samples at 3 and 6 h, peaks corresponding to nickel and aluminum are broad  and short, indicating the presence of nanocrystalline structure.  As we can observe at 9 h, apparently  almost all aluminum was dissolved into nickel and molybdenum or tungsten  matrix; however, there is no evidence of formation of a new phase during  milling.  For Mo and W an effect of  crystallization was observed.  This  behaviour can be related with a process called “mechanically driven  crystallization” since it has been reported that severe mechanical  deformation also induces crystallization in some alloys [13].  Remaining aluminum is not detected by XRD,  probably because it is still in solution within Ni, Mo and W cell, in  accordance with the typical peaks reflections shifting.  On the other hand, there is no evidence of  change in crystalline structure after leaching (Figure 2), as it was reported  several years ago by Ivanov [3]. 
 Figure 1.  XRD patterns of milled samples. 
 Figure 2.  XRD patterns of leached samples (with exception of 0 h sample). In our samples Ni and Mo(W) retained their  FCC and BCC structures after the milling process and leaching treatment since  the chemical dissolution by using alkaline solution is selective for aluminum  [14].  Difractograms for samples at 3  and 6 h reveal the remotion of aluminum during the chemical treatment since  it was not possible to detect its typical peak reflections.  However, an EDS analysis confirmed that  aluminum was not completely removed in the leaching process (see Table 1).  Furthermore, we detected the presence of  oxygen which could be present in the form of oxide but by using these  characterization techniques we can not clarify this and it represents a  highest ongoing characterization challenge in this field.  Molar ratios for the catalysts show variations  depending on the milling time and are smaller than those expected.  This behaviour could be attributed to the  synthesis method. Table 1. EDS  analysis for samples at 3, 6 and 9h before and after leaching process (mol%).          |  |      | Before leaching |   |   |   |   |   |   |      | 3 h | 21.72 | 23.29 | 6.89 | 3.78 | 44.32 |   |      | 6 h | 24.48 | 24.81 | 8.16 | 5.75 | 36.80 |   |      | 9 h | 27.21 | 24.44 | 7.26 | 3.61 | 37.48 |   |      | After leaching |   |   |   |   |   |   |      | 3 h | 24.46 | 44.34 | 19.39 | 8.13 | 3.41 | 0.27 |      | 6 h | 35.21 | 39.74 | 12.21 | 5.84 | 6.63 | 0.39 |      | 9 h | 35.03 | 39.26 | 11.90 | 6.65 | 7.02 | 0.16 |  Figure 3 shows SEM images of milled  samples at 3 and 9 h (before leaching and after leaching).  Samples in the as-milled condition (Figures 3a and c) reveals an irregular  morphology, typical of milled products.   Upon increasing the milling time (9 h), the particles broke down and  show a more uniform shape.  Figure  3(b) presents a SEM micrograph of a leached specimen originally produced at 3  h.  The size and the shape of the  particles before (Figure 3(a)) and after leaching (Figure 3(b)) were almost  unchanged.  On the other hand, a  different behaviour was observed for sample at 9 h wherein the presence of  porosity was evident after the alkaline leaching process.  Figure 3(d) shows a particle containing  small porosity ranging from 1 to 3 μm. 
 Figure 3. SEM micrographs of (Ni50Mo25W25)50Al50  alloys prepared by MA: a) 3 h before leaching,   b) 3 h after leaching, c)9 h before  leaching, and d) 9 h after leaching. Figure 4 presents the SSA before and after  alkaline leaching process.  Figures 5  and 6 show the reaction rate constants (k) and the selectivity (HYD/DDS) of  Ni-Mo-W catalysts (respectively).  The  alkaline leaching process increase the SSA.   This variation in SSA has an important effect in the catalytic  properties. 
 Figure 4.  Specific Surface Area before and after leaching. 
 Figure 5.  Reaction Rate Constants (k) of Ni-Mo-W catalysts. 
 Figure 6.  Selectivity (HYD/DDS) of Ni-Mo-W catalysts. Figures 7(a) and (b) show low magnification  TEM images of a particle of the starting alloy and of final Ni-Mo-W catalyst  prepared at 9 h of milling time.  The  difference in morphology is easily observed: the starting morphology (Figure  7a) is transferred into an aglomerate of particles of spongy form (Figure  7b).  On the other hand, Figure 7c  shows a typical dark field image from as-leached particle at 9 h of milling  time.  This particle presents small  crystal size (40-100 nm) and in some cases lower (10-30 nm).  Note the presence of porous (20-180 nm)  produced by chemical dissolution of aluminum. 
 Figure 7. TEM images from (Ni50Mo25W25)50Al50  alloys prepared by MA at 9 h, a) before leaching, b) after leaching, c) dark field image after leaching. Sample at 6 h exhibits lower catalytic  activity since a lower surface area value was obtained for this sample  compared to their 3 and 9 h counterparts.   On the other hand, the catalytic activity of the sample at 9 h was  enhanced as a result of a great increase in SSA and a more evident presence  of porosity.  This kind of morphology  could favor the catalytic activity since in nanocrystalline alloys, the  enormous quantity of available grain borders and the presence of intergrain  disorder can be important sources of active sites [4]. The HDS of DBT yields biphenyl (BP) through  the so-called direct desulphurization pathway (DDS) and cyclohexilbenzene  (CHB) and tetrahydrodibenzothiophene (THDBT) through the hydrogenative  pathway (HYD).  Since these two  pathways are parallel [15], the selectivity (HYD/DDS) can be approximately  calculated by: (HYD)/(DDS) = ([CHB]+[THDBT])/[BP] All catalysts present a preference for the  DDS pathway, in accordance with previous studies [14]. ConclusionsRaney-type Ni-Mo-W-based catalysts were  produced by combining mechanical alloying and an alkaline leaching  process.  An increase in specific  surface area was obtained after leaching treatment.  The nanocrystalline state, the synergized effect of small  particles and presence of porous and nanoporous affect the catalytic activity  of this kind of catalysts.  These  catalysts show a moderate catalytic activity in the HDS of DBT. AcknowledgementsThe authors thank to W.  Antúnez, E. Torres, H. Esparza and A. Medina for their valuable technical  assistance with SEM/TEM and XRD analysis. References1.       J. Vakros and C.  Kordulis, “On the synergy between tungsten and molybdenum in the W-incorporated  CoMo/Al2O3 hydrodesulfurization catalysts”, Appl. Catal.,  A 217  (2001) 287-293. 2.       Ch. Song and X.  Ma, “New Design Approaches to Ultra Clean Diesel Fuels by Deep  Desulfurization and Deep Dearomatization”, Appl. Catal.,  B 41  (2003) 207-238. 3.        E. Ivanov, A.A. Makhlouf,  K. Sumiyama, H. Yamauchi and K. Suzuki, “ Structural and magnetic properties of  non-equilibrium b.c.c. nickel prepared by leaching  of mechanically alloyed Ni35Al65”, J. of Alloys and Compounds, 185 (1992) 25-34. 4.       R. Schulz, J.Y. Huot, M.L. Trudeau, L. Dignard-Bailey and Z.H. Yan, “Nanocrystalline Ni-Mo alloys  and their application in electrocatalysis”, J. Mater. Res., 9 (11) (1994) 2998-3008. 5.        S. L. Soled, S. Miseo,  R. Krikak, H. Vroman, T. H. Ho and K. L. Riley, “Nickel  Molybodtungstate Hydrotreating Catalysts”, US Patent No. 6, 299, 760 B1 (Oct.  9, 2001). 6.       H TopsØe., B. S.  Clausen and F. E. Massoth, “Hydrotreating Catalysis-Catalysis,  Catalysis Science and Technology”, J. R.  Anderson and M. Boudarts, Eds., Vol. 11 Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1996) 111. 7.       H. Ishihara, T. Itoh, T.  Hino, M. Nomura, P. Qi and T. Kabe, “Effects of Solvents on Deep  Hydrodesulfurization of Benzothiophene and Dibenzothiophene”, J. Catal., 140 (1993) 184-189. 8.       A. J. Jacobson, R.  R Chianelli and T. A Pecoraro, “Transition metal sulfide promoted molybdenum  or tungsten sulfide catalysts and their uses for hydroprocessing”, U.S.  Patent No. 4,650,563 (March 17, 1987). 9.       A. W. Naumann and  A. S. Behan, “Molybdenum disulfide catalyst and the preparation thereof”,  U.S. Patent No. 4,243,554 (January 6, 1981). 10.   R. R. Chianelli,  and T. A. Pecoraro, “Carbon-containing molybdenum and tungsten sulfide  catalysts”, U.S. Patent No. 4,508,847 (April 2, 1985). 11.   T. A Pecoraro and  R. R. Chianelli, “Hydrogenation processes using carbon-containing molybdenum and  tungsten sulfide catalysts”, U.S. Patent No. 4,528,089 (July 9, 1985). 12.   D. J. Sajkowski and S. T. Oyama, “Catalytic hydrotreating by molybdenum carbide and nitride:  unsupported Mo2N and  Mo2C/Al2O3”, Appl. Catal., A 134 (1996) 339. 13.   K. Aoki, M. Sherif  El-Eskandaran, K. Sumiyama and K. Susuki. “Cyclic Crystalline-Amorphous  Transformations by Mechanical Alloying”, Trans Tech  Publications, Switzerland, Material Science Forum, 269-272  (1998) 119-126. 14.   M. Sosa, I.  Estrada-Guel, G. Alonso, C. Ornelas, S. D. De la Torre and R.  Martínez-Sánchez, “Ni-Mo Catalyst Synthesized by Mechanical Alloying”,  Journal of Metastable and Nanocrystalline  Materials, 15-16 (2003) 745-750. 15.   D.D. Whitehurst,  T. Isoda and I. Mochida, “Present State of the Art and Future Challenges in  the Hydrodesulfurization of PolyaromaticSulfur Compounds”. Adv. Catal., 42 (1998) 345. Contact Details       |   R. Huirache-Acuna   Centro de Investigación en Materiales    Avanzados, CIMAVMiguel de Cervantes 120, Complejo Industrial Chihuahua, Chih. 31136, México
   Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de    HidalgoCiudad Universitaria
 Morelia, Mich. México
   E-mail: [email protected]   |   M. I. Flores Z   Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de    HidalgoCiudad Universitaria
 Morelia, Mich. México
   |      |   M. A. Albiter   Centro de Investigación en Materiales    Avanzados, CIMAVMiguel de Cervantes 120, Complejo Industrial Chihuahua, Chih. 31136, México
   Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de    HidalgoCiudad Universitaria
 Morelia, Mich. México
   |   I. Estrada-Guel   Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de    HidalgoCiudad Universitaria
 Morelia, Mich. México
   |      |   C. Ornelas   Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de    HidalgoCiudad Universitaria
 Morelia, Mich. México
   |   F. Paraguay-Delgado   Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de    HidalgoCiudad Universitaria
 Morelia, Mich. México
   |      |   J.L. Rico   Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de    HidalgoCiudad Universitaria
 Morelia, Mich. México
   |   L. Bejar-Gomez   Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de    HidalgoCiudad Universitaria
 Morelia, Mich. México
   |      |   G. Alonso-Nunez   Centro de Investigación en Materiales    Avanzados, CIMAVMiguel de Cervantes 120, Complejo Industrial Chihuahua, Chih. 31136, México
   |   R. Martinez-Sanchez,   Centro de Investigación en Materiales    Avanzados, CIMAVMiguel de Cervantes 120, Complejo Industrial Chihuahua, Chih. 31136, México
   |  |