| Tomorrow’s cars will  handle better, offer improved acceleration, braking and cornering, be lighter  and more fuel efficient, and cause less pollution. But light weight at any  price is not the sole objective. Safety and style, technical feasibility,  environmental impact and affordability, are vital factors. Audi’s launch of the  aluminium A8 and its £47m joint venture manufacturing facility with Alcoa,  have further highlighted the automotive industry’s increasing interest in  alternative materials for the ‘body-in-white’. These, and similar,  developments threaten the dominant position of steel as the quintessential  automotive material. Or do they? Material Trends in the Automotive  IndustryAluminium alloys,  plastics and composites are the ‘new materials for the automotive industry’  (some of them have existed, in various forms, for two or three decades) and  their publicity has eclipsed that for similar advances in steel production  and technology. Today’s average European car contains 70 kg of aluminium and  up to 120 kg of plastics (both almost double the 1980 figures). Sheet steel  contributes 400 kg, and all steels in total account for 55-60% of typical  vehicle weight (as they have for 14 years, even after considerable weight  reductions). Despite, or because of, steel’s dominance in high volume car  production, it is increasingly seen as ‘yesterday’s material’, and the fact  that over 50% of modem automotive steels have been introduced since the mid  1980s is frequently overlooked by the motoring media and public eager for  more attractive alternatives. SteelsThe automotive steels  of the 1990s have better formability, greater capacity for localised/necking  elongation, higher forming limits, smaller bend radii limits, less springback  in pressing operations, and lower sensitivity to galling and surface damage  than alternative materials. The new hot rolled, high-strength  carbon-manganese and carbon-manganese-silicon sheet steels combine yield and  tensile strength with cold formability and they can now increase component  strength, or achieve equivalent strength for less weight (useful in underbody  applications). Bake hardenable steels, in which strength and dent resistance  increase after stowing in the paint shop, are particularly useful in panels  exposed to minor knocks and scrapes, such as doors and boot lids. The Push for Alternative MaterialsThe arguments for  alternative materials concentrate on weight reduction and fuel efficiency,  better performance, tooling cost, and environmental friendliness. In North America  legislative pressure to reduce fuel consumption has sparked the search for a  lighter car. Aluminium and plastics can indeed produce vehicles that are  lighter than current steel models. And these lighter vehicles also have other  benefits, such as fewer parts, by using space frame construction though steel  could also do this. An aluminium panel weighs about half as much as a steel  panel of equivalent strength, and using more aluminium could, it is claimed,  also meet other criteria, although the past 15 years have seen considerable  savings (albeit offset by luxury fittings and safety features) achieved  through rationalisation of car body structures and the use of lighter gauge,  higher strength steels. At present,  alternative materials are most competitive in low volume production where  tooling, rather than materials, most affects unit cost. Aluminium could  reduce body weight by up to 40%, but new steel technologies promise  reductions of up to 35%, leaving aluminium only just ahead. Lighter SteelsWeight reduction also  improves overall performance and handling. A 10% weight loss can reduce  acceleration time from 0 to 60mph by about 8%. Research using finite element  and design sensitivity analysis shows that a 20% or greater reduction in body  weight can be achieved by combining new steels and manufacturing technologies  (such as adhesives and weld bonding). Work involving the American Iron and  Steel Institute (AISI), Ford and Porsche Engineering Services, has shown that  structures 15% stiffer and nearly 20% lighter than existing base saloon cars,  could give savings of about 140lbs per vehicle. As steel is used almost  universally in the automotive industry, reductions could be introduced into  existing facilities almost immediately, increasing the cost advantages of  weight reduction using steels rather than other materials. PlasticsIn contrast, potential  savings with plastics are less clear. Lower densities, relative to steel, are  offset by the need for thicker panels to achieve equivalent stiffness,  inherent problems with consistent panel quality in high volume manufacture,  and a tendency to crack on impact. New manufacturing equipment, such as  injection moulding tools, represent a significant price barrier to a plastic  ‘body-in-white’, especially for manufacturers with substantial investment in  stamping and pressing equipment. Although high corrosion resistance, shape  flexibility, and dent and stone chipping resistance, make plastics useful for  vulnerable parts, such as bumpers, they are never cheaper than steels of  equivalent strength and sometimes cost four times as much. The weight, size and  design (including materials) of a car body all contribute to its behaviour in  an accident (crashworthiness) and the safety of the passengers. Aluminium  structures are capable of absorbing energy equivalent to those using steels.  But the proven performance of steel-bodied cars in a wide range of countless  real life crashes cannot be reproduced easily. Aluminium costs five times as  much as mild steel, however, and while bare aluminium is undoubtedly more  resistant to atmospheric corrosion than bare steel, new coatings and  galvanised steels mean that corrosion is no longer the primary determinant of  a car's lifespan. InfrastructureThe largest, and most  immediate problem in high-volume production with alternative materials is the  expense of a new infrastructure to handle design, manufacture and repair.  Much of that used for steel cars is either unsuitable or incompatible. For  example, aluminium and plastics cannot use presses with magnetic handling so  new handling and post stamping facilities would be needed. Plastics pose  problems with fixing and painting and, like aluminium, are difficult to  integrate with monocoque steel body design, so new joining techniques would  be needed. WeldingAluminium welding  poses special problems. It requires more welding spots to compensate for  lower fatigue strength. Fusion welding is difficult because of oxide  formation, frequently making MIG/TIG welding necessary. And aluminium's  higher surface reflectivity makes laser welding more difficult. Steels  require lower welding currents and lower contact pressures, while electrode  life is longer, and energy consumption three times less. SpaceframesThe constraints on  manufacturing and cost have led to non-traditional body structures, such as  the spaceframe which is made up of aluminium extrusions capable of being bent  or formed, with castings for connection points and aluminium sheet panels.  This uses half as many parts and fewer joints than a sheet metal body and has  led to claims of a 35% reduction in primary body structure weight and a 50%  cut in tooling cost, compared with traditional methods. Disadvantages of Aluminium and  SpaceframesYet for all their ability  to be readily extruded, compared with autobody steels, aluminium alloys have  a lower formability and a greater tendency to springback in press forming.  They are also more prone to handling damage by denting and scraping, and  require prelubricated strip or protection during pressing. This has an impact  on repair, as well as manufacturing processes and a specialised panel and  frame repair system, including a network of dedicated repair shops, would be  needed. Shaping and straightening aluminium parts requires greater  temperature control and special paints to detect overheating or microcracks,  and separate tools and equipment to prevent iron deposits from corrupting  aluminium welds. Spaceframes may require even more sophisticated facilities,  particularly to correct body misalignment, and complex repairs may be  impossible, leading to automatic replacement of damaged parts and higher  insurance premiums. Environmental ConsiderationsEnvironmental issues  increasingly influence automotive design, particularly noise, recycling and  life-cycle pollution. In theory, an aluminium structure’s resistance to  vibration is one third that of an identical steel structure. This means 10 db  more noise, while steel's higher sound-damping capacity reduces road noise.  Aluminium cars can compete by alternative designs or insulation, but the  penalty is extra cost in materials and more weight. Passenger comfort may  also be reduced: aluminium's thermal conductivity is five times that of  steel. This presents problems with external and internal temperatures on hot  days so air conditioning may become a necessary extra. RecyclabilityLegislation in Germany  and North America appears to be heading towards the 100% recyclable car.  Marketing campaigns have presented aluminium as a highly recyclable material.  Pound for pound it has ten times the value of steel sheet scrap. Aluminium,  the material, is potentially recyclable with an appropriate infrastructure  and a limited mix of alloys. But recycling  aluminium cars is highly complex; the different products and alloys likely to  be used are incompatible for recycling into wrought products for car bodies,  and it will take 10-15 years to create an adequate stockpile of scrap, by  which time the alloys in use today may be obsolete. But steel is the world’s  most recycled material and recycling is as old as steel production itself.  Over 400m tons are recycled worldwide each year. This is about ten times the  combined total of all other automotive body materials. Secondary aluminium  production in Europe in 1991 was only 1.6m tonnes. These 400m tons include  20m tons of automotive steel scrap in the USA and Europe using existing  recycling networks. Plastics recycling is minimal and automotive plastics are  causing problems with landfill space. Steel can be separated magnetically,  while plastic resins or aluminium alloys must be segregated with 100%  accuracy, because of their low tolerance to impurities. Different molten  aluminium alloys could be mixed, but only at the expense of downgrading. Some 80% of today’s car  is recycled (including over 95% of the steel), requiring much less energy  than refining from ore. The energy required for primary aluminium production  is five times that of steel, and producing a part from aluminium, rather than  steel, needs almost three times the energy. Although the excess energy in  vehicle parts manufacture is ‘paid back’ during its life, there is an overall  deficit because of increased emission of greenhouse gases in primary  aluminium production, and other problems, such as the caustic ‘red mud’  produced in alumina extraction, and disposal of toxic potliners containing  cyanides and fluorides. The OutlookCar manufacturers are  examining future options, but have already decided the way ahead for the near  future. Very few of the future models are known to include significant  amounts of aluminium or plastic body panels. Meanwhile, Chrysler is replacing  the plastic wing on its LHS with steel, and problems with the Viper's plastic  bumper led to 66% of 1993 production being lost.  Radical new designs,  such as spaceframes, could make aluminium and plastic panels viable, but are  still at the experimental stage. Monocoque bodies - the most economical  construction - are designed for steel panels and substituting alternatives  would lead to problems. Few manufacturers have worked with aluminium in mass  production, and introducing new product forms and working practices will take  time and money. While aluminium alloys and plastics undoubtedly offer some  benefits, car manufacturers are nothing if not realistic and the bottom line  is: alternative materials may exist, but are they cost-effective in producing  safer, ‘greener’ cars? With today's steels, an annual run of just 25,000  units could save US$140 per car (IISI study Competition between steel and aluminium  for the passenger car), or US$525 on a run of 200,000 units. By the time the claims  made for aluminium, plastic and composite exteriors have been examined and  proven (or not) steel will probably have evolved still further, maintaining,  or even improving, its current advantage and preventing mass penetration of  the all-important high volume markets. |