SunPower E20/327 Solar Panels Demonstrate Less Susceptibility to Potential Induced Degradation

SunPower Corp., a leading solar technology and energy services company, today announced that its high-efficiency SunPower® E20/327 Solar Panel recently underwent stringent third-party testing for potential induced degradation (PID) by PV Evolution Labs.

Upon completion, the panels showed power loss of less than 0.2 percent, performing better than any of the others tested. The average degradation of modules that passed this test is approximately four to five percent.

PID is a phenomenon where leakage of electrical current from the solar cell to the panel frame drives ion migration, which modifies the electrical characteristics of the solar cell and degrades the panel's power output. Temperature, humidity and voltage all accelerate this process.

SunPower earned certificates in all grounding configurations and, when compared against conventional panels that passed, its panels degraded at a rate 20 times lower. Only 50 percent of all panels tested successfully passed the program's criteria. A conventional panel is approximately 240 watts, 15 percent efficient and approximately 1.6 square meters in size.

"This third-party testing program confirms that SunPower solar panels are virtually PID free in any grounding configuration and offer extreme resistance to degradation, with the results surpassing the nearest conventional panel," said Tom Werner, SunPower president and CEO. "As a solar technology leader, we are committed to providing our customers with third-party validation, assuring them that they are buying the most reliable panels on the market today."

Testing criteria developed by PV Evolution Labs includes subjecting the solar panels to 600 hours of damp heat conditioning, as defined in international testing standards, and maximum rated voltage stress. After 100 hours of testing, a panel must demonstrate less than five percent power loss and less than 10 percent after 600 hours to pass the test. Of the fifty percent that failed, power loss ranged from 18 percent to 87 percent.

During the testing period, visual inspections, flash testing and high-resolution electroluminescence images are taken to accurately evaluate and monitor the panel's durability. The measured data is then compared to criteria developed to determine if the panel has passed or failed the PID program.

Headquartered in Berkeley, Calif., PV Evolution Labs is an independent testing facility that provides companies developing photovoltaic products and projects with secure, expert testing and performance validation services.

SunPower has received several third-party validations over the past several months that confirm the reliability of its solar panels, including:

  • Atlas Material Testing Technology, LLC issued an unprecedented reliability rating for the SunPower E20/327 Solar Panel, showing less than two percent power drop across all degradation tests performed
  • Fraunhofer announced that the SunPower E20/327 Solar Panel ranked first in its PV Durability Initiative testing, garnering top scores in all ten categories tested
  • In the Photon 2012 Module Yield Test, the SunPower E-Series Solar Panels placed first, second and third in highest performing solar panels out of 151 solar manufacturers participating

Comments

  1. Ray Boggs Ray Boggs United States says:

    Nice, but they cost so much more than conventional front contact cell solar modules that it will take far longer (nearly twice as long) to recoup your investment when compared to solar systems using cells with lower efficiency. And what does higher efficiency mean anyway?  Higher efficiency only means a smaller footprint on your roof. A high efficiency 327 watt solar panel puts out the same 327 watts as a 327 watt low efficiency solar panel. Only it costs more.

    • William Yeager William Yeager United States says:

      Check out the footnotes. The Photon magazine yield test shows us that two 327W panels do not necessarily yield the same output. The rated power only tells us what is happening at 25C and 1000 W/m^2. The article is really about durability though, which also doesn't show up in Standard Test Conditions nameplate ratings.

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of AZoM.com.

Tell Us What You Think

Do you have a review, update or anything you would like to add to this news story?

Leave your feedback
Your comment type
Submit

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.