Feb 15 2019
Each year, about 27 million tires end up in landfills, dumps and stockpiles, where they pose health and environmental hazards. These tires could get a second life as components of the roads they once traveled, but blends of ground tires and asphalt can be unstable. Now, researchers have identified polymer additives that increase the storage stability of asphalt rubber. They report their results in the ACS journal Energy & Fuels.
A polymer additive stabilizes asphalt made with used tire components. (Credit: Don Pablo/Shutterstock.com)
Because rubber is so resilient, scrap tires persist in the environment for a long time, creating fire hazards and breeding grounds for rodents and mosquitoes. This durability could make tires advantageous for producing rubber asphalt –– a mixture of ground tire rubber and bitumen (asphalt) used to pave and repair roads. Currently, about half of U.S. states use ground tire rubber as a component of asphalt mixes, citing better performance than regular asphalt, cost-effectiveness and environmental benefits. However, the material has two major challenges that limit wider use: its high viscosity and tendency to separate into rubber and bitumen layers during storage. Christopher Williams, Eric Cochran and colleagues wanted to identify polymer additives that mitigate these problems.
The researchers studied the stability of rubber asphalt made by blending and extruding different amounts of the polymers cis-isoprene, trans-isoprene, polybutadiene or polyisobutylene with ground tire rubber. The team found that, when mixed with asphalt, blends of ground tire rubber with trans-isoprene or polybutadiene in a 3:1 ratio performed the best. These mixtures reduced the density of ground tire rubber so that it was similar to asphalt and did not settle during storage. The polymers also helped reduce the viscosity of the rubber asphalt so that the material was easier to work with. According to the researchers, the polymer additives are cost-effective, resulting in savings of about 7 to 10 percent compared with regular asphalt.
The authors acknowledge funding from Iowa State University.