Superconductors are a limited group of materials which conduct electricity with zero resistance at lower than certain temperatures (TCs) peculiar to each material. Once zero resistance is achieved, the loss of electric energy becomes zero during the transmission and consumption of electricity.
The application of these superconductors may enable future technology, such as an ultra-high speed transportation system. However, the TCs for known superconductors are too low (~ -250 °C, for example) to be applied. The requirement for superconductors, i.e., what makes common substances transform into high-TC superconductors, is the key to their application in future technologies. This report is a case study focusing on revealing that key factor.
The material is a superconductor with a rather high TC for organic compounds, but for the past thirty years it has been controversially reported to be both a superconductor and a non-superconductor. If we reveal the origin of the inconsistency and the differences between the samples with the opposite properties, we will know the key factor in becoming a (high-TC) superconductor.
After we examined the detailed structures and electrical properties of a series of different samples of this material, we discovered one important fact; even the part of the molecules not involved in the conduction pathways could qualitatively have an effect on the (super)conducting properties. Only the samples containing the required molecular structures exhibited zero-resistance at low temperatures.
This finding indicates that one should carefully design the molecular structures when developing high-TC superconductors, whether they are involved in conduction pathways or not.