Microfluidic Spinning of Polymeric Microfibers for Nerve Guidance Conduits

A recent study published in Advanced Materials Technologies introduced a microfluidic spinning process to create poly(3,4-ethylene dioxythiophene) polystyrene sulfonate (PEDOT:PSS) microfibers.

Researchers used a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) microfluidic chip with a laser-written nozzle to spin fibers from a commercial PEDOT:PSS solution, offering a new approach to fabricating conductive fibers for nerve repair applications.

Scientist using microscope in laboratory.

Image Credit: Volha_R/Shutterstock.com

Background

Peripheral nerve injuries can cause significant disability, often requiring surgical intervention to reconnect severed nerves. When direct suturing is not possible, nerve guidance conduits (NGCs) or grafts help bridge the gap. However, the limited availability of nerve grafts and the complexity of additional surgeries drive research into synthetic alternatives.

Microfibrous fillers are promising for synthetic NGCs because they mimic the natural anisotropic structure of nerves, provide mechanical support, and promote axonal growth. Conductive materials, such as PEDOT polymers, enhance nerve regeneration by offering electrical stimulation while maintaining biocompatibility, flexibility, and biodegradability.

Developing PEDOT:PSS Microfibers

Researchers fabricated microfluidic chips using PDMS through soft lithography, creating a system for controlled fiber spinning. A commercial PEDOT:PSS solution served as the spinning dope, and fiber collection was optimized by adjusting the spindle’s rotational speed to ensure smooth, stable fiber formation.

The surface morphology and diameter of the fibers were analyzed using field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM). Tensile strength was assessed using a custom-built setup with a precision scale and micromanipulator arm, while additional mechanical properties were examined through nanoindentation.

Conductivity was measured via cyclic voltammetry, with the fibers acting as working electrodes against a platinum mesh counter-electrode. The active electrode surface was determined by measuring fiber dimensions under light microscopy.

To evaluate biocompatibility, researchers tested L929 mouse fibroblast adhesion, migration, and proliferation on the microfiber meshes. Cytotoxicity was assessed by comparing metabolic activity in fibroblasts cultured with and without PEDOT:PSS NGCs using a cell proliferation assay.

Key Findings: Stable, Conductive, and Biocompatible Fibers

SEM imaging confirmed that the PEDOT:PSS microfibers had a uniform diameter, smooth surface, and minimal defects. Researchers found that fiber diameter could be controlled by adjusting the flow rates of the spinning dope and shear fluid.

Increasing the total flow rate reduced clogging risks, but exceeding a threshold prevented proper fiber formation. At lower flow rates, the spinning process became unstable.

The system produced microfibers with diameters ranging from 1.2 to 3 µm, with thinner fibers proving too fragile for collection. Despite their small size, the mechanical properties of the PEDOT:PSS fibers were comparable to those of pure PEDOT:PSS.

However, handling individual fibers remained difficult due to their low absolute strength, necessitating the use of fiber bundles for improved stability and bulk handling.

The fibers had a Young’s modulus of 1.22 ± 0.11 MPa, making them suitable for supporting migrating cells. Tensile tests showed they provided structural support against shear, compression, and stretching forces.

Cyclic voltammetry demonstrated the fibers’ electrode stability in electrolyte solutions, revealing their safe operating range, charge storage capacity, and potential resistance to unwanted reactions. Additionally, researchers determined the “water window,” defining the voltage range in which the fibers could function without degradation.

Biocompatibility tests showed no signs of cytotoxicity, with L929 fibroblasts successfully adhering to and proliferating on the fibers. The results suggest that PEDOT:PSS fibers could support axonal ingrowth and Schwann cell migration within NGCs, enhancing nerve regeneration outcomes.

The fibers were softer than other conductive scaffolds used for nerve repair but remained easy to handle, making them practical as fillers in nerve guidance conduits. The proposed microfluidic spinning method offers a controlled approach to studying how topographical, mechanical, and electrical factors influence neuroregeneration.

Journal Reference

Geiger, M., et al. (2025). Microfluidic Spinning of PEDOT: PSS Microfibers for Nerve Guidance Conduits. Advanced Materials Technologies. DOI: 10.1002/admt.202401996, https://advanced.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/admt.202401996

Disclaimer: The views expressed here are those of the author expressed in their private capacity and do not necessarily represent the views of AZoM.com Limited T/A AZoNetwork the owner and operator of this website. This disclaimer forms part of the Terms and conditions of use of this website.

Nidhi Dhull

Written by

Nidhi Dhull

Nidhi Dhull is a freelance scientific writer, editor, and reviewer with a PhD in Physics. Nidhi has an extensive research experience in material sciences. Her research has been mainly focused on biosensing applications of thin films. During her Ph.D., she developed a noninvasive immunosensor for cortisol hormone and a paper-based biosensor for E. coli bacteria. Her works have been published in reputed journals of publishers like Elsevier and Taylor & Francis. She has also made a significant contribution to some pending patents.  

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Dhull, Nidhi. (2025, March 11). Microfluidic Spinning of Polymeric Microfibers for Nerve Guidance Conduits. AZoM. Retrieved on March 12, 2025 from https://www.azom.com/news.aspx?newsID=64337.

  • MLA

    Dhull, Nidhi. "Microfluidic Spinning of Polymeric Microfibers for Nerve Guidance Conduits". AZoM. 12 March 2025. <https://www.azom.com/news.aspx?newsID=64337>.

  • Chicago

    Dhull, Nidhi. "Microfluidic Spinning of Polymeric Microfibers for Nerve Guidance Conduits". AZoM. https://www.azom.com/news.aspx?newsID=64337. (accessed March 12, 2025).

  • Harvard

    Dhull, Nidhi. 2025. Microfluidic Spinning of Polymeric Microfibers for Nerve Guidance Conduits. AZoM, viewed 12 March 2025, https://www.azom.com/news.aspx?newsID=64337.

Tell Us What You Think

Do you have a review, update or anything you would like to add to this news story?

Leave your feedback
Your comment type
Submit

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.